Today’s New York Times reports that the Bush administration was considering the use of the US military in US soil against suspected Al Qaida operatives.
I’m always surprised of how little attention has been given to the ideological framework behind the Bush presidency, and in particular to its theoretical and practical similarities with the so-called “Doctrine of national security”. The latter was taught at the US Army’s School of the Americas in Panama throughout the 60’s and 70’s, and formed the theoretical underpinnings behind the military dictatorships in the Latin American region. It’s a relatively complex doctrine which includes the concept that those seen as enemies by the military (the true guardians of the state), which include those who support, sympathize or are even indifferent to the named enemy, are not protected by the rule of law, and can and should be eliminated. The doctrine calls for the use of the military to fight “terrorism” (by any means necessary) within national borders. The doctrine also calls for the tacit derogation of all human and constitutional rights, and the use of forced disappearances (AKA renditions), torture and extra-judicial executions.
For anyone who grew up under a military dictatorship in America, it’s impossible to not see the parallels between those governments and the Bush administration.
Page 72 of 177
We saw this briefcase, which look like the kind that pilots use to carry documents, just sitting around in the airport near one of the luggage carousels. There was nobody around it, and it indeed went unclaimed for the half an hour or so we were there. Meanwhile dozens of people, including airport personnel, walked by it. Everybody ignored it, nobody reported it. Why not?
Well, in our case because we did not think for a minute that the briefcase would contain a bomb, but feared that if we reported it, the airport security people would over-react, treat it as a national emergency and shut down the airport. Not really what we are looking for after a long flight at 10 PM at night.
As far as airport security goes (and the same can be said about national security) this is a classic “the boy that cried wolf” problem. Airport security is based on paranoia, but people who are not mentally ill can only be paranoid for so long. After a while all the false alarms add up into a general disbelief on actual danger – or at least a disbelief that something can be done to prevent that danger. Anyone who has half a brain knows that we are not appreciatively safer by taking off our shoes, putting our liquids in 3-oz containers and not taking clippers as we go through security. Assuming that terrorists are not stupid – and the fact that we assume they are speaks volumes about our views of foreigners -, they can figure out a way to make it through the well known airport security masures, if they chose to cause another air disaster. The measures that exists do nothing but inconvenience regular travelers. And we don’t want to be inconvenienced any more. Thus the lack of interest in reporting unaccompanied luggage.
For us, not reporting it was clearly the right decision. We felt sorry for the pilot that lost his briefcase, but knew that at that point he wouldn’t get it back anyway. In Paris, years ago, we saw a piece of unaccompanied luggage blown up. At least they didn’t close the airport to do it.
Her name was Rosalía. I think. I can’t be sure, but in my memory she will always be Rosalía. She was blond, with curls. Perhaps not particularly smart, the worst in the class? She sat next to me throughout the year. I don’t think we really became friends, though. Perhaps the problem was that she lived far away, in Barrio Jardín. Or perhaps the problem was that she was poor. Even now, thirty four years later that’s what I remember of her. My six-year-old assumption that she was poor – because she lived in Barrio Jardín and someone must have said it was a poor neighborhood. I went to her house once, for her birthday party. It was not a fancy house, but not so different from other houses closer to the centro. I remember that we played a game called palitos (little sticks). I don’t remember how the game went.
First grade finished and she did not come back for second grade. I never saw her again.
Why do I remember her?
My teacher for first grade (and second) was called Ana María Guerrini de De Battista. She was young, pretty, married. I remember writing down her name on my notebook, but that would have been in second grade. She was a good teacher, kind and patient. A segunda mamá, second mom – when I was little, at least, that’s how teachers were seen in Argentina. I don’t remember much about her, but when I think of her I feel warm inside. Perhaps it’s just the smile in her picture, it seems sincere.
I heard, some years ago, that she died. I just googled her name and I found her orbituary. She died in 2003, had two children and apparently many friends, for what I can see in the paper. It saddens me, of course.
There were five first-grade classes at my school, the Escuela Normal Nacional No 2 “Dardo Rocha”. Before school started we had to take a placement test and I apparently did not do very well, as they assigned me to 1o E. I looked at my test years later and, beyond being able to pronounce “Nabucodonosor” and cut straight, I didn’t do that badly. I would, in time, of course, show that I wasn’t the burrita my placement implied – but I was offended and humiliated at the time. Perhaps I still am.
For some reason I will never understand, the textbook for first grade (whose name I don’t remember after all these years) was out of print when I entered elementary school. I remember my parents’ efforts to find one. They finally were able to buy a used book, but it was already all written up. I was jealous of the kids that had new books.
The Escuela Normal Nacional No 2, or “Normal 2”, as we all called it, was, as the name implies, a “national” school, depending directly from the federal Ministry of Education. There were also provincial schools and private schools. National schools had the best reputation and you needed some pull to get in. In my case, my aunt Gladys had taught English at the high school part of the school for many years and was friend with the school principal. Once a sibling was in, the others were as well, but you needed to know someone to start. I wonder how Rosalia was able to get in.
The Normal 2 operated in what I believe had been a huge warehouse. It had two “pavilions”, huge buildings with classrooms opening to a large central court (covered). Between them there was another building, long and narrow, which hosted the classrooms for 6th and 7th grade. To one side of this building was the flag pole, to the other the “gymnasium”, really just an open court. There were three more wooden buildings beyond the second pavilion. There were patios here and there, a field that served for sports, and another paved area with store selling snacks and another selling school supplies. I am sure I’m forgetting something (like the lab? where was the lab?).
My first grade class was off the first pavilion.
Throughout my “career” at the Normal 2 (and I went there for 7 years), I had to carry several notebooks: the cuaderno único or main notebook, where all the real work went in. The cuaderno borrador, or practice notebook. The cuaderno de avisos, or notification notebook. And then there were the notebooks for the other classes. I also had to carry my reading book. With time, notebooks and books became very heavy, in particular given that backpacks did not arrive to Argentina until years later and we then used briefcases to carry our books. Calluses grew on my fingers and my mom would joke that I carried “rocks” to school.
We went to school from 1 PM to 5 PM. We had 5 class periods, separated by one long 15 minute break and three short 5 minute breaks, so in reality, we only had three and a half hours of instruction a day. And yet, my education in Argentina was so superior to the one I got in the States.
In addition to regular classes, we had (during school time) classes on Music, Drawing, P.E., Crafts and “Optional Activities”, the latter changed from time to time.
I learned to read and write in first grade. At that time, at least, children started first grade without knowing anything about letters. We started by making palotes, straight lines on paper. From there we moved to the letter “a” and later to “m” and so forth. We learned to read and write in cursive, print would not come until 3rd grade.
I have gotten back in touch with some of my school mates from back then through Facebook. Karina and Julieta, specifically. There was also María Marta, the two Silvinas, Ricardo (the troublemaker), Sandra, Adolfo and so many others. Most stayed in the Normal until 7th grade. Some dropped out, transferring to “easier” schools. Ricardo, Alejandro, Monica, Juan Jose. Should I write their last name, so they can find this post if they search for their names and thus find me, or is it a violation of their privacy?
For the last few days, my 4-yo daughter Camila’s head has been smelling quite badly, sort of like rotten fish. We were traveling in the Yucatan, going from cenotes to the pool to the sea, and never quite getting a good shower, so we thought it was environmental smell, easily eliminated by a good bath. Well, we tried it yesterday morning and it didn’t work – she soon started stinking again.
The smell was so bad by last night that I was worried she might be sick. I tried to localize it, but I couldn’t, I could smell it more strongly around her head, and it seemed to come from her sweat. That worried me, as one of my sisters suffered from kidney disease and you could smell urea on her skin and breath when her kidneys were malfunctioning. This smell was different, but it made me quite anxious.
I called the nurse advise line, but under the premise that the smell was coming from her sweat, the nurse could not help me at all – she had never heard of that happening and couldn’t find any references to it. So, I kept looking online and found a discussion that mentioned that bad smell in little children could signify an ear infection. Indeed, Camila had had some discharge from her ears a few days before, while swimming at a cenote, and she’s had tubes put on her ears, so an ear infection made sense. I went to smell her again, and indeed the smell was strongest in her left ear.
Today we took her to the pediatrician and confirmed that, indeed, she has an ear infection (her first, I think). She’s been prescribed some antibiotics and she’ll be fine, but I thought I would share this information with the world, in case another worried parent searches for reasons their small child smells bad.
The pediatrician told me that it’s advisable for children with tubes in their ears to wear ear plugs while swimming – in particular in less-than-clean water sources, like cenotes. This is no longer standard advise, too bad we didn’t get it before.
Recent Comments