My mother got this jewelry kit for Mika and she just made a necklace for herself. This kit has a very original “clasp” that makes making jewelry both fun and easy for kids. You start by passing the included string through a plastic flower clasp, which closes and keeps the string secure. This way you can avoid making knots or having to use traditional clasps. The flower clasps are light purple and not very attractive, but you’d wear them behind your neck or under your wrist (if you make a bracelet) so that should be OK. What makes it cool is that you insert a magnet both at the beginning and end of the string, which then attract each other, making it easy to “close” the necklace. That way you don’t have to deal with a difficult clasp or have to make the necklace long enough to pass over your head. I wish they had the same system for adult jewelry.
The beads the set comes with are very pretty. There are metallic cylinders, white and lilac drops, bright pinkish and purplish flowers and other things. You are supposed to intercept magnetic beads every so often to make it easier to wrap your necklace around your wrist as a bracelet or make it look like a pendant. Mika didn’t do it on her first necklace, but she ended up with a gorgeous, gorgeous necklace that looks great on her (picture below).

Note: The metallic bead on the top right corner of the picture is the end of one of Mika’s braids, nothing to do with the necklace 🙂
One thing to keep in mind is that the kit comes with only 4 clasps – enough for 2 necklaces. Alas, we lost one of the clasps, so the necklace above is as much as we’ll make from this kit.
Page 70 of 177
AP reports today that some veterans of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, including a first-term congressman, are questioning the low number of medals that have been awarded in these two wars: six. In comparison, 244 were awarded in the Vietnam war. The military argues that the current wars don’t present the same opportunities for incredible heroism, something which the veterans question. I think I’m with the military on this one.
The only Congressional Medal of Honor recipient that I’ve ever met is Charles Liteky, a former Catholic priest and Army chaplain who saved over 20 wounded men during a savage battle in Vietnam by carrying them from the battlefield to a safe zone while dodging enemy fire. Read his wikipedia entry, it is incredible what this man did. I cannot imagine that valor like his is particularly common.
I came across Liteky through Mike’s work with School of the Americas Watch (Mike was responsible for scanning and ocr’ing the lists of SOA graduates and their “torture” manuals’; after his work the School of the Americas started denying requests for new lists of graduates.) Liteky is (was?) fully involved in the organization, “crossing” the line in peaceful demonstrations to bring attention to the perverse work of the School of the Americas. For those unfamiliar with it, it’s the American military institution that instructs Latin American military on how to fight social movements at home. It was one of the institutions where the doctrine of national security was developed and disseminated. Many of its graduates have been accused of committing crimes against humanity. Liteky has been arrested and sent to prison several times for his peaceful protests – even as he entered his 70’s. And continues fighting the good fight.
I would hope that the Medal of Honor not suffer the fate of the Presidential Medal of Freedom which is given almost exclusively for political considerations (Bush gave it to people who are likely to have committed crimes against humanity themselves). Hopefully it will continue meaning something – but as our cultures becomes a greater and greater celebrator of mediocracy, it’s unlikely that it will.
LONDON (AP) – The government says an illegal immigrant sneaked into the U.K. by smuggling himself aboard a bus full of British border agents.
Britain’s Home Office says the man hid in the small space between the bus’s chassis and its fuel tank as it traveled through the Channel Tunnel from the French town of Coquelles to the British coastal city of Dover.
The Daily Mail newspaper reported Saturday that the bus carried at least 20 Border Agency staff, whose job it is to keep illegal immigrants out. The newspaper says the man was spotted dropping from the bus on to the road but ran away before he could be caught.
The Home Office said the incident occurred within the last week but could not immediately give a precise date. It said the man has not been caught.
http://www.salon.com/wires/ap/world/2009/07/30/D99P2CM80_eu_med_failed_un_strategy/index.html
One of the reasons why I work in human rights is because it is a mostly unambiguous field. Torturing, executing people extra-judicially, denying them due process rights is wrong. Period. There are some areas that are a bit gray – should we pursue the criminal indictment of sitting presidents, when it’s likely that by doing so they will increase repression in their own countries and/or deny access to humanitarian agencies? But in general, it’s pretty black and white.
Not so with humanitarian work. The old adage that you should not give a man a fish but teach him how to fish has definitely some truth to it – though it doesn’t explain what you should do when there are no fish in the river. And there are complex questions such as to what degree humanitarian aid absolves governments of their own responsibility to provide economic rights to their own people, to what degree it contributes to de-politicize local populations and maintain the political status quo and to what degree it has negative unintended consequences. For example, humanitarian aid is often appropriated by corrupt governments or armed groups that use it to hold populations hostage or to allow them to allocate their resources to weapons and so forth. And then there is the question of effectiveness.
This study shows that development aid aimed at children in Bangladesh has been pretty much useless: “in areas where the program wasn’t implemented, slightly more children were vaccinated against measles, and there was no big difference in death rates.” Similar accusations have been made in other instances.
I, of course, have no answers. It’s better to try and fail than to not try at all – but it’s of little use to throw money at a problem without really understanding it. And I, of course, do not (understand it). So I continue with my morally “safe” occupation and leave more complex ethical matters to others 🙂
Recent Comments